Harry Week continues, and I find that, alas, I was forced into my media blackout prematurely. I ran across a headline on Tuesday that said the book had been leaked, and that was it for me. Thus, I know not what antics Britney indulged in...which anorexic personality is pregnant...oh, yeah, and I don't know what happened in Iraq either. It's a painful thing, this living without the Internet. But at least I remain spoiler-free.
Anyway....to celebrate this holiest of occasions, I thought I would resurrect a post from the days of yore, in which I gave my Very Important Predictions of what would happen in book 7. You can read it and delight in the acrid whiff of bar-fear that permeates the post...plus you can mock me for being so very, very wrong. AFTER this weekend. SPOIL IT FOR ME AND DIE!
"There's Something About Harry"
Originally posted 6-27-06
So J.K. Rowling is coyly suggesting she may kill off Harry Potter in the last book.
Is this really such a shocking statement? I think there are a few things we can readily assume about the final book, things that numerous people before me have proposed (let's call them "stipulated facts," my fellow Bar sufferers):
1) Voldemort will be defeated.
2) Harry himself is a Horcrux.
3) All of the other Horcruxes will be eliminated, leaving Harry as the only thing preventing Voldemort's final demise.
4) This raises at least the possibility that Harry has to die in order for Voldemort to be defeated.
So the fact that J.K. Rowling would drop hints about this isn't really earth-shattering news. That final "fact" will be the true conflict at the center of book 7.
She has stated outright that two characters will die, and let's go ahead and presume she's not including Voldemort himself in that body count, or any other previously established Death Eater (previously established = understood to be a Death Eater as of book 5).
I'm voting for Snape to be the main victim -- redemption, double-double-crosses, sacrifice, yada yada yada. (Do I need to fill in the details? Surely everyone's heard it all already). Rowling says there's a character who "got a reprieve." That could be Snape, but I'm predicting not.
In fact, I kinda think there might be another redemption/sacrifice blah blah blah plotline involving Draco Malfoy -- and he might be the one she's referring to.
That leaves one other main character to be killed off. Harry? Maybe. But I'm guessing not. I'm sure that prospect will be a major part of book 7, but in the end something (involving Snape??) will intervene. So it could be any assortment of others -- one of the favored teachers, one of his friends, one of the Weasleys? Do any of these count as main characters?
I'm thinking not Ron or Hermione, because their cute little romance has been building through all the books and I don't see it not reaching fruition (but might be a possibility nonetheless).
If I had to vote, I'd say the second victim will be Neville Longbottom...he's been tied to Harry from the beginning (as Voldemort's could-have-been nemesis if circumstances had been different), and it seems likely he will play an important role in the end.
But the thing that I know will make C want to throttle me is that I think the book would be A LOT BETTER if Harry really does cash in his chips. The most honest, most heroic ending would be for him to come to terms with and MAKE that sacrifice -- and not to have some absurd deus ex machina resolution at the last minute. For me, it's that kind of painful, all-too-realistic tragedy that makes a book truly great instead of just pretty good. It's the way that The Lord of the Rings doesn't really have a happy ending, if Frodo's struggle is the heart of the series. (And it is. So there.) Heartbreaking. But excellent.
I'm all for it....
If only I could devote this kind PASSION to studying for the bar. I could totally ace the Law of Harry Potter question!